Safe and Supported Practice: What Rural Allied Health Professionals Need to Thrive
“I feel attracted to areas where, when people talk about their jobs, they enjoy the people that they’re working with and they feel safe and supported.”
This straightforward statement from one of my research participants captures something profound about rural Allied Health practice. Beyond connection and belonging, rural AHPs need to feel they can practice safely and with appropriate support – despite the unique challenges of their context.
My research revealed that “Safe and Supported Practice” means something quite specific in rural settings. It’s about creating conditions where practitioners can flourish professionally, despite geographical isolation, limited resources, and often working as the sole representative of their profession.
Let’s explore the three critical components that emerged from my research.
Allied – Insights for a Thriving Rural Workforce is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Subscribe
Connectivity & Technology: More Than Just WiFi
For rural AHPs, technology and connectivity issues aren’t minor inconveniences – they’re fundamental practice challenges that can impact client safety and professional effectiveness.
Participants described sobering realities that urban colleagues might find hard to imagine:
- No mobile coverage for kilometres during client visits
- Standing on a specific tree stump in a paddock to get signal
- Sharing a single laptop between an entire team
- Driving hours to access diagnostic equipment kept only at the base hospital
“It calls into question how decisions are made,” one participant reflected, “such as about electronic records to improve health care access for rural people, when we don’t have the technology to upload our clinical activity into these systems.”
The disconnect between urban-designed systems and rural realities creates significant barriers. Yet participants also demonstrated remarkable resilience and innovation in finding workarounds – though they shouldn’t have to.
What’s needed isn’t just more technology, but appropriate technology that recognises rural realities. This includes:
- Mobile devices that work in remote areas
- Vehicles suitable for country roads
- Multiple sets of commonly used equipment
- Remote access to patient records
- Safety considerations for isolated work
Valuing Learning: Professional Growth in Rural Contexts
Professional development emerged as both a significant challenge and a crucial retention factor for rural AHPs.
Participants described frustrations including:
- In-house training primarily designed for nursing staff
- Specialist courses unavailable in Aotearoa
- Higher costs to access training due to travel and accommodation
- Limited access to supervision from experienced practitioners
- Rules preventing international training even when necessary
“I don’t want to go to the same entry-level talk every year just to count them in my CPD folder,” one participant explained. “I want it to actually be clinically significant.”
Participants also expressed concerns about inequity between professions. They observed medical and nursing colleagues receiving more substantial professional development support while AHPs often struggled to access basic training.
The message was clear: When organisations don’t demonstrate they value AHP learning needs, they risk losing experienced practitioners who can’t see a pathway for growth.
Effective approaches include:
- Equitable funding across professions
- Rural-specific professional development
- Flexible approaches to accessing learning
- Recognition of specialist needs
- Support for international training where needed
Relationship with Leader(ship): Distance Doesn’t Diminish Importance
Perhaps most powerfully, participants emphasised how crucial their relationship with leadership was to feeling safe and supported in practice.
Picture this scenario:
- Your manager is 200km away
- You’re the sole practitioner on site
- A complex case lands on your desk
- But… you know they’ve got your back
What made the difference? Trust, respect, and understanding of rural realities.
One rural AHP put it perfectly: “I would rather have pen and paper and no resources and work my arse off for somebody who gives a damn.”
Effective rural leadership manifested in several ways:
Leaders who showed manaakitanga by being present One participant described a manager who spent one day in a rural clinic: “Within 45 minutes of being here, she had two assessments to do in [a neighbouring town] and we needed a third one to do here… And she was just like, ‘So what do you guys normally do when you have got this?’”
That day changed their manager’s whole understanding of rural practice reality.
Trust that empowered practice “I feel like I’ve got that freedom. She definitely trusts me that I’ll do the work.”
When leaders trust their rural AHPs, practitioners can focus on what matters most – supporting their rural whānau.
Understanding of rural contexts Service changes? New tools? Great leaders recognise these land differently in rural settings. They adapt, consult, and support their teams through change.
The Urban-Rural Divide: A Challenge to Safety
A concerning pattern emerged around how urban colleagues sometimes view rural practitioners. Participants described experiences where their clinical judgement or competence was questioned by urban-based colleagues, creating a sense of being “less than” despite often working with broader scope and responsibility.
One participant described receiving advice from an urban-based legal team that demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of rural practice realities and statutory responsibilities.
This “urban narcissism” – the unconscious devaluing of rural knowledge and experience – creates significant barriers to safe practice when rural AHPs need to consult with urban specialists or services.
Creating Safe and Supported Rural Practice
For rural health leaders and organisations, these findings highlight several priorities:
- Resourcing that matches rural realities – technology, equipment, and vehicles appropriate to the context
- Equity in learning opportunities – professional development that’s accessible and relevant
- Leadership presence – regular time spent in rural settings by managers
- Trust and autonomy – empowering rural practitioners to make decisions
- Challenging urban biases – advocating for rural practice as different, not lesser
In my next post, I’ll explore the third major theme from my research: Creating Roles People Want to Come For – the practical elements that make rural roles genuinely attractive to Allied Health Professionals.
